Re: [PATCH] Fix font rendering error in FreeType 2.8.1 update, memory allocation related?

2018-03-12 Thread Bryan Linton
On 2018-03-11 18:03:27, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 11:58:50AM +0900, Bryan Linton wrote: > > [I sent a copy of this email to tech@ 24 hours ago and it hasn't > > shown up yet. Apologies if this ends up being a double-post.] > > > > Hello tech@ > > > > I'm not sure if it's b

Re: sparc64 softraid boot: workaround for memory leak

2018-03-12 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On my T5220 LDOM guests cannot boot from softraid because ofwboot > crashes with a "Fast Data Access MMU Miss" while loading the kernel: > > >> OpenBSD BOOT 1.9 > ERROR: /iscsi-hba: No iscsi-n

Kernel size beyond 16 MB on amd64

2018-03-12 Thread Franco Fichtner
Hi, With regard to a commit[1] by Theo in 2013, several questions in the years before and a partial lift of the limitation on i386 a while back (2015?) I'd like to ask what the future plans are for OpenBSD. Peeking at NetBSD, where the amd64 was bootstrapped, they are at 48 MB kernel size at the

unhandled firmware response in iwm0

2018-03-12 Thread Jan Schreiber
Hi, when connecting to an open wifi I get following message: iwm0: unhandled firmware response 0xce/0xb82c rx ring 0[48] I added another case which ignores the IWM_BT_PROFILE_NOTIFICATION. I didn't notice any change when connecting, except that the message is gone. diff --git sys/dev/pci/if

Re: Kernel size beyond 16 MB on amd64

2018-03-12 Thread Mike Larkin
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:50:42PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi, > > With regard to a commit[1] by Theo in 2013, several questions > in the years before and a partial lift of the limitation on > i386 a while back (2015?) I'd like to ask what the future plans > are for OpenBSD. > > Peeking a

Re: arm64: Makefile.arm64 av7 content

2018-03-12 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:10:41 +0200 > From: Artturi Alm > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:34:23PM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > > Hi, > > > > was 'grepping' for something, and these came up. > > > > i guess atleast trampoline.S would work w/o including assym.h at all, > > but here is what i'm sur

Re: armv7/arm64: just a bit || some tc_counter_mask fixes

2018-03-12 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 19:43:42 +0200 > From: Artturi Alm > > Hi, > > lazy retry[0], > to give these timers their (likely) copy-paste-robbed MSB back. > > -Artturi > > [0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=150421823512699&w=1 This doesn't actually fix anything; 31 bits are plenty. Leaving

Re: armv7/arm64: just a bit || some tc_counter_mask fixes

2018-03-12 Thread Artturi Alm
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:25:09PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 19:43:42 +0200 > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > Hi, > > > > lazy retry[0], > > to give these timers their (likely) copy-paste-robbed MSB back. > > > > -Artturi > > > > [0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=

Re: armv7/arm64: just a bit || some tc_counter_mask fixes

2018-03-12 Thread Artturi Alm
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:25:09PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 19:43:42 +0200 > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > Hi, > > > > lazy retry[0], > > to give these timers their (likely) copy-paste-robbed MSB back. > > > > -Artturi > > > > [0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=