On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 03:12:02PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your review.
>
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 20:03:50 +0300
> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:20:13PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> >> You propose to unlink pppx(4) related session which
>
>
> OpenBSD has the explicit_bzero function to reliably (i.e. even if not
> observable in the C abstract machine) overwrite memory with zeroes.
> WG14 is currently considering adding similar functionality to C2X.
>
> Considered options include:
>
> * A function like explicit_bzero or
moving to tech@
-- Forwarded message -
From: Philipp Klaus Krause
Date: Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:34 AM
Subject: explicit_bzero vs. alternatives
To:
OpenBSD has the explicit_bzero function to reliably (i.e. even if not
observable in the C abstract machine) overwrite memory with
Leo,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:46:19AM +0200, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> Hey,
> i love your patch. The current behavour always bothered me because it caused
> servers to display "wrong" sites as defaults for all requests missing the
> Host header. I really like your patch and it works fine for me on
On Sun, Aug 09 2020, Ross L Richardson wrote:
> At present, if a request contains no "Host:" header [HTTP pre-1.1] or
> if the supplied header does not match any of the servers configured
> in httpd.conf, the request is directed to the first server. This
> isn't documented, AFAICT.
>
> For
We are doing all wrong :)
We can just unlink pppx(4) related session from `pipex_session_list' if
it's time expired. But since this unlinked session is still exists in
pppx(4) layer we can access through pppx_get_closed() without any
search. We should only add flag to session which identifies it
On Mon, Aug 10 2020, Ross L Richardson wrote:
> Leo,
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:46:19AM +0200, Leo Unglaub wrote:
>> Hey,
>> i love your patch. The current behavour always bothered me because it caused
>> servers to display "wrong" sites as defaults for all requests missing the
>> Host
On 2020-08-08 22:47, Marcus Glocker wrote:
Can we maybe add a small comment explaining the inverted parity bits
behaviour on cold boot for this firmware version?
Sure thing.
Index: pms.c
===
RCS file:
> On 10 Aug 2020, at 19:53, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>
> We are doing all wrong :)
>
> We can just unlink pppx(4) related session from `pipex_session_list' if
> it's time expired. But since this unlinked session is still exists in
> pppx(4) layer we can access through pppx_get_closed()
Ross L Richardson(open...@rlr.id.au) on 2020.08.09 20:07:11 +1000:
>
> At present, if a request contains no "Host:" header [HTTP pre-1.1] or
> if the supplied header does not match any of the servers configured
> in httpd.conf, the request is directed to the first server. This
> isn't
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> moving to tech@
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Philipp Klaus Krause
> Date: Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:34 AM
> Subject: explicit_bzero vs. alternatives
> To:
>
>
> OpenBSD has the explicit_bzero function to reliably (i.e. even if
While looking into filtering out messages for L2 routes in the kernel to reduce
load on routing daemons, I noticed that the RTM_DELETE messages do not have
the RTF_LLINFO flag set, which is inconvenient because that's what I want to
filter on.
I tracked this down to r1.361 and r1.362 of
Hi,
Thank you for your review.
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 20:03:50 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:20:13PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> You propose to unlink pppx(4) related session which reached timeout. I'm
>> ok with this direction. But I see no reason to rework
Hey,
i love your patch. The current behavour always bothered me because it
caused servers to display "wrong" sites as defaults for all requests
missing the Host header. I really like your patch and it works fine for
me on my servers.
However, i am not an official dev, so i cannot give you an
14 matches
Mail list logo
