On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > Please sync your source tree before attempting to apply this patch.
> > I have committed some changes to this driver today which this patch
> > is based on.
> > Works for me on AX200/AX201. Does anyone else want to do a
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 11:42:31PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 22:27:52 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> >
> > > Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 20:55:10 +0200 (CEST)
> > > From: Mark Kettenis
> > >
> > > This time adding support for Sunrisepoint-H and Sunrisepoint-LP.
> >
I want to move a little bit forward with fine grained locking in UNIX
domain sockets area. My goal is to introduce the new rwlock(9) for
garbage collector data and keep existing `unp_lock' only for per-socket
data. This will allow to replace it by per-socket `so_lock' in the
future.
I like to
On 12.10.2021. 14:47, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This patch adds support for 40MHz channels to iwx(4).
>
> Please sync your source tree before attempting to apply this patch.
> I have committed some changes to this driver today which this patch
> is based on.
>
> Works for me on AX200/AX201. Does
Christian Weisgerber:
> Here's another attempt, incorporating millert's feedback and adding
> a few more casts:
Any interest in this or not worth the churn and I should drop it?
> Index: bin/chio/parse.y
> ===
> RCS file:
This patch adds support for 40MHz channels to iwx(4).
Please sync your source tree before attempting to apply this patch.
I have committed some changes to this driver today which this patch
is based on.
Works for me on AX200/AX201. Does anyone else want to do a pre-commit test?
diff
+1 improvement here too.
before: ~50 mbit/s
after: ~75 mbit/s
hth,
cheers,
eric.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:27 PM Felix Kronlage-Dammers
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>
> > > Please sync your source tree before attempting to apply this patch.
> > >
Christian Weisgerber(na...@mips.inka.de) on 2021.10.12 12:49:24 +0200:
> Christian Weisgerber:
>
> > Here's another attempt, incorporating millert's feedback and adding
> > a few more casts:
>
> Any interest in this or not worth the churn and I should drop it?
i think it should go in.
ok