> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:16:03 +
> From: Visa Hankala
>
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:55:03AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe we should rename the file to efi_installboot.c and/or rearrange
> > > the code slightly such that is becomes more obvious that
On Mon, Jan 31 2022, Greg Steuck wrote:
> Patrick Wildt writes:
>
>> regarding the missing userpace support: Since a few clang updates ago
>> we import more than just the builtins of compiler-rt. This means we
>> should have at least some related code in our tree, even if it is not
>>
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:47:59 +
> From: Miod Vallat
>
> On PowerMac11,2 systems, the PCIe bus attaches as:
>
> mpcpcibr0 at mainbus0 pci: u4-pcie
> pci0 at mpcpcibr0 bus 0
>
> However none of the devices attached to pci0 will appear in pcidump.
>
> This is caused by an incorrect bus
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:55:03AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should rename the file to efi_installboot.c and/or rearrange
> > the code slightly such that is becomes more obvious that the name of
> > the file is indeed the only difference.
>
> And
On PowerMac11,2 systems, the PCIe bus attaches as:
mpcpcibr0 at mainbus0 pci: u4-pcie
pci0 at mpcpcibr0 bus 0
However none of the devices attached to pci0 will appear in pcidump.
This is caused by an incorrect bus number during attachment of the
pci(4) subdevice. The following diff queries the
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:52:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> This definitely wants testing on Ryzen ThinkPads (e.g. E485/E585/X395/T495s)
> or Inspiron 5505, I see user TSC disabled on a lot of those in dmesglog.
>
>
hi.
here are the results from a 5505. was the timecounter meant to
That's a good step.
Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:55:03AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe we should rename the file to efi_installboot.c and/or rearrange
> > > the code slightly such that is becomes more obvious that the name of
> > >
This definitely wants testing on Ryzen ThinkPads (e.g. E485/E585/X395/T495s)
or Inspiron 5505, I see user TSC disabled on a lot of those in dmesglog.
On 2022/01/27 10:28, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sthen@ complained recently about a multisocket system not being able
> to use the TSC in
> On Feb 2, 2022, at 13:29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
>> On 2022/02/02 13:51, Dave Voutila wrote:
>>
>> Jason McIntyre writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:52:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
This definitely wants testing on Ryzen ThinkPads (e.g.
> Index: usr.sbin/installboot/armv7_installboot.c
> ===
> RCS file: src/usr.sbin/installboot/armv7_installboot.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -p -r1.11 armv7_installboot.c
> --- usr.sbin/installboot/armv7_installboot.c 20
Jason McIntyre writes:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:52:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> This definitely wants testing on Ryzen ThinkPads (e.g. E485/E585/X395/T495s)
>> or Inspiron 5505, I see user TSC disabled on a lot of those in dmesglog.
>>
>>
>
> hi.
>
> here are the results from a
Thanks for testing.
On 2022/02/02 13:51, Dave Voutila wrote:
>
> Jason McIntyre writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:52:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> This definitely wants testing on Ryzen ThinkPads (e.g.
> >> E485/E585/X395/T495s)
> >> or Inspiron 5505, I see user TSC disabled
Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Index: usr.sbin/installboot/armv7_installboot.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: src/usr.sbin/installboot/armv7_installboot.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.11
> > diff -u -p -r1.11 armv7_installboot.c
> > ---
Hi,
With the new m_pullup() code, I see crashes on armv7 and sparc64.
regress/sbin/slaacd sends some IPv6 ND6 packets over pair(4) from
scapy. It crashes after m_pullup() in ipv6_check().
run-parse-ra
ifconfig pair1 destroy 2>/dev/null || true
ifconfig pair2 destroy 2>/dev/null ||
Stuart Henderson writes:
> Thanks for testing.
>
> On 2022/02/02 13:51, Dave Voutila wrote:
>>
>> Jason McIntyre writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:52:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >> This definitely wants testing on Ryzen ThinkPads (e.g.
>> >> E485/E585/X395/T495s)
>> >> or
Two DPRINTFs in sys/net/if_wg.c are missing a newline.
diff --git if_wg.c if_wg.c
index 13c48f42c54..a3efd577dbc 100644
--- if_wg.c
+++ if_wg.c
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ wg_output(struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf *m, struct
sockaddr *sa,
}
if (m->m_pkthdr.ph_loopcnt++ > M_MAXLOOP) {
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 07:46:39PM -0600, Matthew Martin wrote:
> Two DPRINTFs in sys/net/if_wg.c are missing a newline.
>
if this is committed, the committer may also want to question the dodgy
capitals in "Delay Unsupported".
jmc
>
> diff --git if_wg.c if_wg.c
> index
Hello,
I can confirm the same behaviour with this patch applied.
$ sysctl kern.timecounter
kern.timecounter.tick=1
kern.timecounter.timestepwarnings=0
kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254
kern.timecounter.choice=i8254(0) tsc(-1000) acpihpet0(1000) acpitimer0(1000)
$ sysctl hw
hw.machine=amd64
18 matches
Mail list logo
