On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:04:03PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 25 January 2016 at 01:38, Jonathon Sisson <open...@j3z.org> wrote:
> > Not certain if this is debug output put there intentionally or
>
> Yes.
>
> > if this is some error condition?
>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image.
>
> Machines with the Intel NIC will not show any netfront in the device list via
> XenStore (just try Ubuntu).
>
> Reyk
That's correct, but I think what was being pointed out is that
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:57:21PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
> > On 23.01.2016, at 22:27, Jonathon Sisson <open...@j3z.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> >> No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image.
&g
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 02:18:17PM -0800, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> Speaking of testing, is there any particular area non-devs could
> assist with at this time? Gathering dmesgs for different instance
> types?
>
I decided to spin up one of each instance type and grab the console
ou
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Hi Jonathon,
>
> Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this.
>
No, thank you guys for all of the work you're doing to get
this working. I'm just a user heh.
>
> Trying newer kernels would be the most helpful. I've just
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:08:32PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 24 January 2016 at 20:55, Jonathon Sisson <open...@j3z.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> Hi Jonathon,
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for taking
