On 2009-12-29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/12/28 21:45, Brad wrote:
>> The following diff adds support for sysconf(3) for the variables
>> _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF and _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN.
>>
>> I have run into this being used by 3 programs in ports so far.
>
> At least 45 (I'm part-way throug
On 2009/12/28 21:45, Brad wrote:
> The following diff adds support for sysconf(3) for the variables
> _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF and _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN.
>
> I have run into this being used by 3 programs in ports so far.
At least 45 (I'm part-way through a grep over ports source), I'll try
and remembe
> Updated and re-posting again now that we're clear of the ABI lock
> for h2k9.
Funny. You can now consider us entering the ABI lock for n2k10.
Updated and re-posting again now that we're clear of the ABI lock
for h2k9.
- Forwarded message from Brad -
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:17:06 -0500
From: Brad
To: tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Add support for sysconf(3) _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF /
_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN
User-Agent:
The following diff adds support for sysconf(3) for the variables
_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF and _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN.
Implemented by AIX/Tru64/Solaris/Linux/FreeBSD/NetBSD.
I have run into this being used by 3 programs in ports so far.
Index: lib/libc/shlib_version
==