On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > interested in squashing the remaining
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks
On Dec 04 14:28:23, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Dec 04 12:23:42, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > On Dec 01 09:07:43, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > > > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > > > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > > > > > interested in
On Dec 04 12:23:42, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Dec 01 09:07:43, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > > > > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your
On Dec 01 09:07:43, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > > > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your
> > > > > usual
> > > > > setup & report back.
>
Hi,
I've tested the second diff (containing the bug fix and I get a lock
order reversal on bootup. On the first patch I was getting the same
lock order reversal while using X and sometimes (only sometimes) would
crash X.
witness: lock order reversal:
1st 0xfd83fef05248 uobjlk (>vmobjlock)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks
> * Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > > setup & report back.
> >
> > Thanks to all the testers, here's
Hi Martin,
* Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks to all the testers, here's a
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks
> > > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > > > setup & report back.
> > >
> > > Thanks to all the testers, here's a new version
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 07:17:14PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> While here, I notice that sysctl.witness.watch is documented
> in witness(4), but kern.witness.locktrace is not - is that intended?
>
It is documented on options(4)
option WITNESS_LOCKTRACE
Enable witness(4) lock stack
On Nov 30 10:40:25, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> On 2021/11/29 22:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> >
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks
On 2021/11/29 22:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> > setup & report back.
>
> Thanks to all the testers,
On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> setup & report back.
Thanks to all the testers, here's a new version that includes a bug fix.
Tests on
Hi Martin,
* Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
> setup & report back.
I have the diff running on a Thinkpad T450s and noticed no regessions so
far. Will continue
Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
interested in squashing the remaining bugs. Please test with your usual
setup & report back.
Thanks,
Martin
diff --git sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC.MP sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC.MP
index bb842f6d96e..e5334c19eac 100644
---
19 matches
Mail list logo
