On 22.4.2021. 13:08, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 22.4.2021. 12:38, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> It is not clear why the lock helps. Is it a bug in routing or ARP?
>> Or is it just different timing introduced by the additional kernel
>> lock? The parallel network task stress the subsystems of the
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:43:24 +0200
> > From: Alexandr Nedvedicky
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:09:34PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:33:13PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski
On 22/04/21(Thu) 15:08, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:43:24 +0200
> > From: Alexandr Nedvedicky
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:09:34PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:33:13PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > > > r620-1#
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:43:24 +0200
> From: Alexandr Nedvedicky
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:09:34PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:33:13PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > > r620-1# papnpaiancini:cc :p :op
> > >
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:09:34PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:33:13PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > r620-1# papnpaiancini:cc :p :op
> > opooolo_llc_ac_caccahhceh_ei_eti_tieetmme_mm__amgamigacigci__cc_hccehhcekcekc::
> > k :m bmubmfubfuppflp llc pc pcuup
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:09:34 +0200
> From: Alexander Bluhm
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:33:13PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > r620-1# papnpaiancini:cc :p :op
> > opooolo_llc_ac_caccahhceh_ei_eti_tieetmme_mm__amgamigacigci__cc_hccehhcekcekc::
> > k :m bmubmfubfuppflp llc pc pcuup uf
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:33:13PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> r620-1# papnpaiancini:cc :p :op
> opooolo_llc_ac_caccahhceh_ei_eti_tieetmme_mm__amgamigacigci__cc_hccehhcekcekc::
> k :m bmubmfubfuppflp llc pc pcuup uf rfferree eel el iilsitss tm tom
> omddoidfiiifeifeidde:d ::i ti etietmme m
>
On 22.4.2021. 12:38, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> It is not clear why the lock helps. Is it a bug in routing or ARP?
> Or is it just different timing introduced by the additional kernel
> lock? The parallel network task stress the subsystems of the kernel
> more than before with MP load. Having
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:36:07AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 22.4.2021. 11:02, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > This was without my kernel lock around ARP bandage, right?
>
> yes, yes ...
Good. Just wanted to be sure.
> > Did you enter boot reboot before doing mach ddbcpu 0xa?
>
> nope...
On 22.4.2021. 11:36, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> if you want i'll try to reproduce in on other boxes..
> maybe i can trigger it here easily because of 2 sockets ?
on second box with 6 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2643 v2 @ 3.50GHz,
3600.02 MHz..
r620-1# papnpaiancini:cc :p :op
On 22.4.2021. 11:02, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:03:22AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> something like this:
>>
>> x3550m4# pappnaiannc:iicc :p:o ppoolo_oolcla__ddcohoe__gg_eiettt::e m
>> _mmcbmualg2fkpilc2_:: chppeaag
>> gceke: ee mmmbppttuyfyp
>
> This was without
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:03:22AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> something like this:
>
> x3550m4# pappnaiannc:iicc :p:o ppoolo_oolcla__ddcohoe__gg_eiettt::e m
> _mmcbmualg2fkpilc2_:: chppeaag
> gceke: ee mmmbppttuyfyp
This was without my kernel lock around ARP bandage, right?
> ddb{9}>
On 22.4.2021. 1:10, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 22.4.2021. 0:31, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
Hi,
with this diff i'm getting panic when i'm pushing traffic over that box.
This is plain forwarding. To compile with witness ?
>>>
>>>
>>> with witness
>>>
>>
>>
On 22.4.2021. 0:31, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> with this diff i'm getting panic when i'm pushing traffic over that box.
>>> This is plain forwarding. To compile with witness ?
>>
>>
>> with witness
>>
>
> any chance to check other CPUs to see what code they are
Hello,
> > Hi,
> >
> > with this diff i'm getting panic when i'm pushing traffic over that box.
> > This is plain forwarding. To compile with witness ?
>
>
> with witness
>
any chance to check other CPUs to see what code they are executing?
I hope to be lucky enough and see thread,
15 matches
Mail list logo