On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:25:08PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> Listing what something *doesn't* do is generally a bad plan, because
> the list has no end, so where to draw the line becomes a matter of
> opinion. Better to list what the installer does update and say that's
> the complete list,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote:
...
> However I still would like to see a quick note telling the user
> that he should remember to update all source-based data because
> the installer won't do it for them . Maybe something like "The
> installer doesn't
> However I still would like to see a quick note telling the user
> that he should remember to update all source-based data because
> the installer won't do it for them . Maybe something like "The
> installer doesn't automatically update source files, for example
> in /usr/src".
Yeah, we could
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:00:40AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:59:20AM +0200, Simon Ruderich wrote:
>> I'm a relatively new OpenBSD user and just updated my system from
>> 5.9 to 6.0 but forgot to update the files in /usr/src. Thus when
>> I applied the latest patches
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:59:20AM +0200, Simon Ruderich wrote:
> I'm a relatively new OpenBSD user and just updated my system from
> 5.9 to 6.0 but forgot to update the files in /usr/src. Thus when
> I applied the latest patches (001-006) I actually built an old
> 5.9 kernel which failed to boot.