Re: [PATCH] www: mention /usr/src in upgrade notes

2016-09-19 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:25:08PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: > Listing what something *doesn't* do is generally a bad plan, because > the list has no end, so where to draw the line becomes a matter of > opinion. Better to list what the installer does update and say that's > the complete list,

Re: [PATCH] www: mention /usr/src in upgrade notes

2016-09-19 Thread Philip Guenther
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote: ... > However I still would like to see a quick note telling the user > that he should remember to update all source-based data because > the installer won't do it for them . Maybe something like "The > installer doesn't

Re: [PATCH] www: mention /usr/src in upgrade notes

2016-09-19 Thread Theo de Raadt
> However I still would like to see a quick note telling the user > that he should remember to update all source-based data because > the installer won't do it for them . Maybe something like "The > installer doesn't automatically update source files, for example > in /usr/src". Yeah, we could

Re: [PATCH] www: mention /usr/src in upgrade notes

2016-09-19 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:00:40AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:59:20AM +0200, Simon Ruderich wrote: >> I'm a relatively new OpenBSD user and just updated my system from >> 5.9 to 6.0 but forgot to update the files in /usr/src. Thus when >> I applied the latest patches

Re: [PATCH] www: mention /usr/src in upgrade notes

2016-09-18 Thread Theo Buehler
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:59:20AM +0200, Simon Ruderich wrote: > I'm a relatively new OpenBSD user and just updated my system from > 5.9 to 6.0 but forgot to update the files in /usr/src. Thus when > I applied the latest patches (001-006) I actually built an old > 5.9 kernel which failed to boot.