Re: [patch]rcs: usage functions above the main ones

2015-11-08 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:42:10AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: Ping ... > > this seems fine to me > > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:38:40PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > > Hi tech@, > > > > most of the tools implements the *usage* function above the *main* function. > > This patch

Re: [patch]rcs: usage functions above the main ones

2015-09-18 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:42:10AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > this seems fine to me > Ping ... > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:38:40PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > > Hi tech@, > > > > most of the tools implements the *usage* function above the *main* function. > > This patch

Re: [patch]rcs: usage functions above the main ones

2015-06-23 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:42:10AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: this seems fine to me Ping On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:38:40PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: Hi tech@, most of the tools implements the *usage* function above the *main* function. This patch makes it more

Re: [patch]rcs: usage functions above the main ones

2015-06-15 Thread Nicholas Marriott
this seems fine to me On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:38:40PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: Hi tech@, most of the tools implements the *usage* function above the *main* function. This patch makes it more consistent to these tools and where the different *usage* functions are implemented