Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Sebastian Benoit(be...@openbsd.org) on 2020.06.29 16:18:03 +0200: > Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2020.06.26 14:45:53 +0200: > > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > > as usual. Nothing

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2020.06.26 14:45:53 +0200: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > improve. If you have time

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Uwe Werler
Woahhh, was also trying 5GHz (and tcpbench against one of our bsd servers in DMZ): 469651560 bytes sent over 85.291 seconds bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 3.475/43.927/87.071/29.809 Mbps 6 new output block ack agreements 0 output block ack agreements timed out (Tomorrow @work

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Uwe Werler
Hi Stefan, for me the patch works in mode 11n: before (OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #304: Fri Jun 26 02:08:50 MDT 2020) bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 2.354/12.319/15.391/3.850 Mbps with patch (OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Mon Jun 29 09:35:24 GMT 2020) bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Jesper Wallin
Tested on a "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 9260" rev 0x29, msix (hw rev 0x320, fw ver 34.3125811985.0) I seem to be getting "iwm0: fatal firmware error" a few seconds after the 4-way handshake. I can send a few packets, so it sure connects and all, but then it fails shortly after. iwm0: begin

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Denis Fondras
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). iwm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless AC 7260" rev 0x73, msi AP is Zyxel USG40W Before : bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 9.800/14.000/14.214/0.606 Mbps

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Tracey Emery
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > improve. If you have

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Johan Huldtgren
On 2020-06-26 20:11, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > hello, > > On 2020-06-26 14:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > It would be great to get at least one test for all the chipsets the driver > > supports: 7260, 7265, 3160, 3165, 3168, 8260, 8265, 9260, 9560 > > The behaviour of the access point also matters

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Tobias Heider
Works for me on a 7260. [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 06:14:48PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > > as usual. Nothing

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Mike Larkin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:01:03PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > > as usual. Nothing should

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Mike Larkin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > improve. If you have

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Johan Huldtgren
hello, On 2020-06-26 14:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > It would be great to get at least one test for all the chipsets the driver > supports: 7260, 7265, 3160, 3165, 3168, 8260, 8265, 9260, 9560 > The behaviour of the access point also matters a great deal. It won't > hurt to test the same chipset

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Todd Carson
This is from an 8265: iwm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265" rev 0x88, msi iwm0: hw rev 0x230, fw ver 34.0.1, Associated to an Apple AirPort AP on a 5 GHz channel. Before: bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 11.402/17.410/36.190/4.079 Mbps After: bandwidth

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > improve. If you have

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Florian Obser
Seems to be working on a X1 gen2 using iwm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless AC 7260" rev 0x83, msi against a Unifi AP-SHD. Before: bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 7.344/9.077/11.514/0.803 Mbps after: bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 12.551/65.407/82.835/14.169 Mbps -- I'm