> libtls is tied to libressl as a matter of convenience and happenstance,
> but it doesn't need to be that way.
If I recall, libtls requires the ability to pass certs as memory rather
than directly loading it from a file. And OpenSSL native lacks any way
of doing this, and their team rejected
Brent Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:27:16AM -0600, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> > Has there been any discussion of packaging libtls separately from libressl
> > for portable use? With my limited skills I was able to write a program to
> > talk to smtpd and starttls using nothing
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:27:16AM -0600, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> Has there been any discussion of packaging libtls separately from libressl
> for portable use? With my limited skills I was able to write a program to
> talk to smtpd and starttls using nothing but the manuals. I
