On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:27:36AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 18/04/16(Mon) 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> > process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> > the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve this
> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 11:27:36 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 18/04/16(Mon) 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> > process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> > the
On 18/04/16(Mon) 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve this goal we're progressively moving
> code from the softnet interrupt context
2016-04-25 9:59 GMT+02:00 Martin Pieuchot :
> > > The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> > > process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> > > the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve this goal we're progressively moving
> > > code
On 20/04/16(Wed) 09:33, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> > process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> > the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve this goal we're progressively moving
> code from the softnet
On 18.4.2016. 15:31, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 18.4.2016. 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
>> process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
>> the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve this goal we're progressively
On 18.4.2016. 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve this goal we're progressively moving
> code from the softnet interrupt context to
On 18/04/16(Mon) 11:33, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> [...]
> However, this diff uses the same taskq for both the "unlocked" and
> "locked" parts. My experience with crypto code was that frequently
> grabbing and releasing the kernel lock did affect latency in a bad
> way. Some time ago dlg@ had a
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:50:46 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> The current goal of the Network SMP effort is to have a single CPU
> process the IP forwarding path in a process context without holding
> the KERNEL_LOCK(). To achieve this goal we're progressively moving
>
10 matches
Mail list logo