If possible I would like to apologetically unsay the unpleasant words.
The only concern was the wrapping code does not impede the development
of the underlying framework or change it in some limiting way.
Certainly this is most likely not happening so the comments were
unnecessary on my part.
On 2015 Jul 21 (Tue) at 23:51:37 +0300 (+0300), li...@wrant.com wrote:
: Your contributions to the lists are rants or useless noise. What's your
: motivation and do you really gain something by doing that?
:
:Like mentioning the ruby idiot is an idiot? Sure. Who the contributor
:are you?
:
The
Wrant.. Go away. If you had any experience as a real developer on
anything you would understand the message to wait until the API is
stable, otherwise we're just wasting people's time and effort.
Your attitude is offensive to all of us who work on this project.
Please take your ungratefulness
Is it not too early to jump gun on this, stone carving gemologist
procto international man of mystery and disguise?
This is extremely premature.
The tame() in my devtree already has major incompatible changes.
Wrant.. Go away.
On my way out can I gently kick the usual ruby wrapper to death?
Several times. I'd come for more.
Your attitude is offensive to all of us who work on this project.
Why is open speech offensive, we're not that old already?
On Jul 21, 2015 11:21 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
Wrant.. Go away.
On my way out can I gently kick the usual ruby wrapper to death?
Several times. I'd come for more.
Your attitude is offensive to all of us who work on this project.
Why is open speech offensive, we're not that old
Your contributions to the lists are rants or useless noise. What's your
motivation and do you really gain something by doing that?
Like mentioning the ruby idiot is an idiot? Sure. Who the contributor
are you?
