Re: Patch to add -l flag to cat(1)
So, what's the story with the -l option? What change/fix in OpenBSD base requires it? Nothing requires it explicitly, more the question of if having the ability for cat to set exclusive locks on its stdout so that multiple calls to the same cat command will cause the the output to be arranged in sequence is useful. Yes, and maybe the same option should be added to every command!
Re: Patch to add -l flag to cat(1)
Hi Philip, On 23/07/2015 00:54, Philip Guenther wrote: This is the second time you've sent a patching adding a feature without saying *why* the feature should be added. That's not very helpful. Apologies. Your first patch for cat added a feature (-f option) to solve problem in NetBSD which had to be solved in a different way in OpenBSD. As as result, we're not adding the -f option to OpenBSD. The reason that patch was raised was not to fix issues in security(8) in OpenBSD, I understood it as you came the realisation that you're vulnerable to the same problem that the NetBSD folks were trying to fix by adding -f to their cat(1). So, what's the story with the -l option? What change/fix in OpenBSD base requires it? Nothing requires it explicitly, more the question of if having the ability for cat to set exclusive locks on its stdout so that multiple calls to the same cat command will cause the the output to be arranged in sequence is useful. (It's not portable, so any portable program should be doing this via a more powerful, portable tool, like perl, python, or C.) Understood. Sevan
Re: Patch to add -l flag to cat(1)
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Sevan Janiyan ventur...@geeklan.co.uk wrote: Attached patch adds the -l flag to cat This option causes cat(1) to use fcntl(2) to set an exclusive advisory lock on stdout. which was used to guarantee orderly writing to file. Obtained from NetBSD cat.c r1.26 This is the second time you've sent a patching adding a feature without saying *why* the feature should be added. That's not very helpful. Your first patch for cat added a feature (-f option) to solve problem in NetBSD which had to be solved in a different way in OpenBSD. As as result, we're not adding the -f option to OpenBSD. So, what's the story with the -l option? What change/fix in OpenBSD base requires it? (It's not portable, so any portable program should be doing this via a more powerful, portable tool, like perl, python, or C.) Philip Guenther
