On 12/04/16(Tue) 14:43, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2016-04-12, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> > Relying on the "scopeid" field is not a viable long-term solution. I'm
> > spending too much time these days trying to figure out which interface
> > correspond to which index.
>
Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2016.04.12 16:25:36 +0200:
> On 12/04/16(Tue) 14:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/04/12 14:18, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:47:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson
Christian Weisgerber(na...@mips.inka.de) on 2016.04.12 14:43:50 +:
> On 2016-04-12, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> > Relying on the "scopeid" field is not a viable long-term solution. I'm
> > spending too much time these days trying to figure out which interface
> > correspond
On 2016-04-12, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Relying on the "scopeid" field is not a viable long-term solution. I'm
> spending too much time these days trying to figure out which interface
> correspond to which index.
What's the general use case for this? I mean apart from
On 12/04/16(Tue) 14:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/04/12 14:18, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:47:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2016/04/12 13:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > >
On 2016/04/12 14:18, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:47:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2016/04/12 13:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > Relying on the "scopeid" field is not a viable long-term
On 2016/04/12 08:32, sven falempin wrote:
> still advocating for a structured output of system commands like ifconfig
> -json,
freebsd is > that way ;-)
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:47:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2016/04/12 13:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > Relying on the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:47:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/04/12 13:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Relying on the "scopeid" field is not a viable long-term solution. I'm
> > > spending too much time these days
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/04/12 13:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Relying on the "scopeid" field is not a viable long-term solution. I'm
> > spending too much time these days trying to figure out which interface
> > correspond to which index.
> >
On 2016/04/12 13:00, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Relying on the "scopeid" field is not a viable long-term solution. I'm
> spending too much time these days trying to figure out which interface
> correspond to which index.
>
> Here's a difference in output, then the diff itself. ok?
>
> @@ -1,31
11 matches
Mail list logo