No.
First of all, because there is no justification.
Secondly, because it is not documented.
But thirdly, because we keep shit simple so that people don't build
their own stuff on top of our infrastructure, so that if we feel the
need to change/break our own infrastructure we don't need to give a shit
about anyone doing weird stuff on their own.
So the short answer would be no, because what you propose does not
serve the greater userbase in any way. It only serves you, apparently.
Sven F. <sven.falem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bienvenue,
>
> --- /usr/sbin/sysupgrade.old Tue May 16 18:53:13 2023
> +++ /usr/sbin/sysupgrade Tue May 16 19:04:46 2023
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
> case ${_LINE} in
> *\ ${_KEY}) SIGNIFY_KEY=/etc/signify/${_KEY} ;;
> *\ ${_NEXTKEY}) SIGNIFY_KEY=/etc/signify/${_NEXTKEY} ;;
> +*\ *.pub) SIGNIFY_KEY=/etc/signify/${_LINE##* } && echo Using custom
> key $SIGNIFY_KEY ;;
> *) err "invalid signing key" ;;
> esac
>
> Read the signing key in the file so you can use a custom key when
> testing release,
>
> Have a good one.
>
