On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:08:55AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 20/10/22(Thu) 16:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 11/09/22(Sun) 12:26, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> > > are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove()
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 30/10/22(Sun) 12:45, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:40:02PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > regress on i386/GENERIC.MP+WITNESS with this diff shows
> >
> > Another one; This machine has three read-only
On 30/10/22(Sun) 12:45, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:40:02PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > regress on i386/GENERIC.MP+WITNESS with this diff shows
>
> Another one; This machine has three read-only NFS mounts, but none of
> them are used during builds or regress.
It's the
On 30/10/22(Sun) 12:40, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:08:55AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 20/10/22(Thu) 16:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 11/09/22(Sun) 12:26, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> >
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:40:02PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> regress on i386/GENERIC.MP+WITNESS with this diff shows
Another one; This machine has three read-only NFS mounts, but none of
them are used during builds or regress.
This one is most certainly from the NFS regress tests
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:08:55AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 20/10/22(Thu) 16:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 11/09/22(Sun) 12:26, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> > > are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove()
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:08:55AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 20/10/22(Thu) 16:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 11/09/22(Sun) 12:26, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> > > are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove()
On 20/10/22(Thu) 16:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 11/09/22(Sun) 12:26, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> > are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove() which are the guts of
> > mmap(2) for anons and munmap(2).
> >
> > Please
On 11/09/22(Sun) 12:26, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove() which are the guts of
> mmap(2) for anons and munmap(2).
>
> Please test it with WITNESS enabled and report back.
New version
On 14/09/22(Wed) 15:47, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On 14.09.22 18:55, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> > > are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove() which are the
On 14.09.22 18:55, Mike Larkin wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove() which are the guts of
mmap(2) for anons and munmap(2).
Please test it
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below adds a minimalist set of assertions to ensure proper locks
> are held in uvm_mapanon() and uvm_unmap_remove() which are the guts of
> mmap(2) for anons and munmap(2).
>
> Please test it with WITNESS enabled and report
12 matches
Mail list logo