On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:55:13PM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:56:37AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> > > As the last diff still had formatting issues i fixed that.
> >
> > OK by me.
> >
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:56:37AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> > As the last diff still had formatting issues i fixed that.
>
> OK by me.
>
> Nitpick: There are overlong lines here (please stay <= 80 columns).
>
> > +
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> As the last diff still had formatting issues i fixed that.
OK by me.
Nitpick: There are overlong lines here (please stay <= 80 columns).
> + sc->sc_sens[THINKPAD_SENSOR_PORTREPL].status =
> SENSOR_S_OK;
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 11:43:43PM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:31:55AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:28:04PM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> > > Hi @tech,
> > >
> > > i thought it would be a good idea to delegate the
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:31:55AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:28:04PM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> > Hi @tech,
> >
> > i thought it would be a good idea to delegate the port-replicator
> > docking event to the sysctl(2) hw.sensors substree so that if the
> >
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:28:04PM +0200, Tobias Tschinkowitz wrote:
> Hi @tech,
>
> i thought it would be a good idea to delegate the port-replicator
> docking event to the sysctl(2) hw.sensors substree so that if the
> thinkpad gets docked/undocked one could react to it by using
> sensorsd(8).
