On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:32:23AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 01:11:52PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > On 2017-11-17, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> > > can we have modified displays within a view?
> >
> > We already have this for the ifstat view.
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 01:11:52PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2017-11-17, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > can we have modified displays within a view?
>
> We already have this for the ifstat view.
>
> The character B changes the counter view between bytes and
> bits.
On 2017-11-17, David Gwynne wrote:
> can we have modified displays within a view?
We already have this for the ifstat view.
The character B changes the counter view between bytes and
bits. Pressing b displays statistics as calculated from boot
> On 17 Nov 2017, at 05:39, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 03:21:20PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:29:42PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> im adding numbers to input and output qdrops in the kernel, so im
>>> aware that
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 07:22:48AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Now ifstat and iqdrops show almost the same information. Just two
> > commns are different, eight culumns are redundant. I think one
> > page would be better. Do we need DESC? It takes a lot of space
> > that could be used for
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 03:21:20PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:29:42PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > im adding numbers to input and output qdrops in the kernel, so im
> > aware that they exist now. however, i don't really see these values
> > in userland. it seems
> Now ifstat and iqdrops show almost the same information. Just two
> commns are different, eight culumns are redundant. I think one
> page would be better. Do we need DESC? It takes a lot of space
> that could be used for output of dynamic counters.
I use DESC every single day.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:29:42PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> im adding numbers to input and output qdrops in the kernel, so im
> aware that they exist now. however, i don't really see these values
> in userland. it seems netstat and systat think errors are more
> important.
>
> i tried adding