Jason McIntyre wrote, On 05/15/14 13:54:
the man page sates that:
Both auth and auth-optional accept an optional table as a
parameter. When provided, credentials are looked up in this
table.
but reading the new smtpd.conf(5) gives the impression that authtable is
mandatory. I haven't
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:22:35AM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
Jason McIntyre wrote, On 05/15/14 13:54:
the man page sates that:
Both auth and auth-optional accept an optional table as a
parameter. When provided, credentials are looked up in this
table.
but reading the new
Jason McIntyre wrote, On 06/07/14 00:51:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:22:35AM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
Jason McIntyre wrote, On 05/15/14 13:54:
the man page sates that:
Both auth and auth-optional accept an optional table as a
parameter. When provided, credentials are looked up in this
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 09:53:39PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:40:27PM +0200, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:16:59PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
it's still missing some . also i think we can wholly simplify the
Hi Jason,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:16:59PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
it's still missing some . also i think we can wholly simplify the
auth/auth-optional line.
Heh. Thought I found all, thanks for fixing the rest.
-.Op Ic auth | auth-optional | auth Ar authtable | Ic auth-optional Ar
Hi,
here's a new version for the manpage bug Creamy mentioned.
Frank.
Index: usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.117
diff -u -r1.117 smtpd.conf.5
---
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:10:03PM +0200, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
Hi,
here's a new version for the manpage bug Creamy mentioned.
Frank.
it's still missing some . also i think we can wholly simplify the
auth/auth-optional line.
how's this?
jmc
Index: smtpd.conf.5
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:39:22PM +0200, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:03:14PM +0100, Creamy wrote:
So the manual page is wrong, or at least misleading, because
the syntax of the examples differs between from, sender, and
for, so it's not clear whether the angle brackets
Shouldn't that be:
+.Op Ic auth | auth-optional | auth Aq Ar authtable Aq | Ic auth-optional Ar
authtable
??? Looks like it fixed itself incorrectly :-)))
:-P
But you're right, the fix was wrong, missed that one. But it doesn't
work your way either. If I understand mdoc(7) correctly
Le 10/05/2014 17:54, Creamy a écrit :
table creamy db:/etc/mail/creamy.db
table secrets db:/etc/mail/secrets.db
accept sender creamy for domain example.com relay via
smtps+auth://foo...@smtp.creamylan.lan auth secrets
Shouldn't it be :
accept sender creamy for domain example.com ...
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
Le 10/05/2014 17:54, Creamy a ?crit :
table creamy db:/etc/mail/creamy.db
table secrets db:/etc/mail/secrets.db
accept sender creamy for domain example.com relay via
smtps+auth://foo...@smtp.creamylan.lan auth secrets
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:03:14PM +0100, Creamy wrote:
So the manual page is wrong, or at least misleading, because
the syntax of the examples differs between from, sender, and
for, so it's not clear whether the angle brackets are
intended to be literally included, or whether they are just
12 matches
Mail list logo
