On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:04:00AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09 2018, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > I was wondering for a second whether vnet(4) had IPv6 related bugs or so.
>
> Probably Mark's preferences, from when link-local IPv6 addresses were
> created by default.
>
> > Let's keep the example simple and defer such choices to the user.
> >
> > Feedback? OK?
>
> ok
Yes, OK. IPv6 works just fine with ldom guests.
> > Index: ldomctl.8
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ldomctl/ldomctl.8,v
> > retrieving revision 1.9
> > diff -u -p -r1.9 ldomctl.8
> > --- ldomctl.8 26 Jan 2017 12:26:20 - 1.9
> > +++ ldomctl.8 8 Apr 2018 22:47:14 -
> > @@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ Configure the
> > interfaces for the guest domains.
> > This example bridges guest domains into the physical network:
> > .Bd -literal -offset indent
> > -# ifconfig vnet0 -inet6 up
> > -# ifconfig vnet1 -inet6 up
> > +# ifconfig vnet0 up
> > +# ifconfig vnet1 up
> > # ifconfig bridge0 create
> > # ifconfig bridge0 add em0 add vnet0 add vnet1 up
> > .Ed
> >
>
> --
> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
>
