Ted Unangst wrote:
> Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Assuming the check on protection is a bit too restrictive, and it is
> > fine to have some chunks with PROT_NONE, I think we want something like:
>
> are readonly stacks meaningful? if so, we should fix that too now instead of
> waiting.
Other sy
Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Assuming the check on protection is a bit too restrictive, and it is
> fine to have some chunks with PROT_NONE, I think we want something like:
are readonly stacks meaningful? if so, we should fix that too now instead of
waiting.
>
> Index: uvm/uvm_map.c
> =
