On Mon, Mar 25 2019, Remi Locherer wrote:
[...]
> This works and it makes sense to me.
>
> The log message is a bit lengthy compared to other log messages produced
> by ospfd. Maybe something like this: "router-id changed: restart required"
Yep, fine with me.
> But the patch is also OK remi@
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:43:26PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Mitchell Krome wrote:
> > On 24/03/2019 7:23 am, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
> Was messing
ok
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas(j...@wxcvbn.org) on 2019.03.25 14:43:26 +0100:
> On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Mitchell Krome wrote:
> > On 24/03/2019 7:23 am, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
> Was
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, Mitchell Krome wrote:
> On 24/03/2019 7:23 am, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>>
>>> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
Was messing around with ospf and got myself into a situation where the
router ID's were the
On 24/03/2019 7:23 am, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
>> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
>>> Was messing around with ospf and got myself into a situation where the
>>> router ID's were the same on two boxes because I only did a reload on
Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
> > Was messing around with ospf and got myself into a situation where the
> > router ID's were the same on two boxes because I only did a reload on
> > one of them when I changed the loopback IP's.
>
Mitchell Krome(mitchellkr...@gmail.com) on 2019.03.23 20:27:17 +1000:
> Was messing around with ospf and got myself into a situation where the
> router ID's were the same on two boxes because I only did a reload on
> one of them when I changed the loopback IP's.
Thats sub optimal i believe...
>
