On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 02:44:51AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:30:06AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > The diff below makes pipex(4) a little bit more parallelization
> > > reliable.
>
> > > @@ -2238,10 +2240,6 @@ pipex_mppe_input(struct mbuf *m0, struct
> > >
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:30:06AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > The diff below makes pipex(4) a little bit more parallelization
> > reliable.
> > @@ -2238,10 +2240,6 @@ pipex_mppe_input(struct mbuf *m0, struct
> > coher_cnt &= PIPEX_COHERENCY_CNT_MASK;
> > pktloss = 0;
> >
> > -
ping
> On 22 Jul 2021, at 01:56, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>
> With bluhm@'s diff for parallel forwarding pipex(4) could be accessed in
> parallel through (*ifp->if_input)() -> ether_input() ->
> pipex_pppoe_input(). PPPOE pipex(4) sessions are mostly immutable except
> MPPE crypt.
>
> The
