On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:00:34PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:09:44AM +, Robert Peichaer wrote:
> > The rationale to picking the library versions before remounting was
> > to keep the time window having rw /usr as small as possible.
> > If that's deemed ok, I'm
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:00:34PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:09:44AM +, Robert Peichaer wrote:
> > The rationale to picking the library versions before remounting was
> > to keep the time window having rw /usr as small as possible.
> > If that's deemed ok, I'm
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:09:44AM +, Robert Peichaer wrote:
> The rationale to picking the library versions before remounting was
> to keep the time window having rw /usr as small as possible.
> If that's deemed ok, I'm too OK with switching the steps.
Considering the fact that the now
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:18:00AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 03:34:07AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > $_l is not used and picking the latest archive versions is of no use
> > if /usr/lib cannot be written to.
> >
> > This patch applies cleanly before my next one but
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 07:18:00AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 03:34:07AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > $_l is not used and picking the latest archive versions is of no use
> > if /usr/lib cannot be written to.
> >
> > This patch applies cleanly before my next one but
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 03:34:07AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> $_l is not used and picking the latest archive versions is of no use
> if /usr/lib cannot be written to.
>
> This patch applies cleanly before my next one but not vice versa.
>
> Feedback? OK?
_l is only unused after your second
