On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:54:31PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> It's handy and otherwise easily missed when reading up on routing
> domains and tables; wording taken from netstat(1) as is.
>
> Not listing pgrep(1)'s `-T' because examples don't have to be exhaustive
> and ps(1) is already demonst
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:54:31PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> It's handy and otherwise easily missed when reading up on routing
> domains and tables; wording taken from netstat(1) as is.
>
> Not listing pgrep(1)'s `-T' because examples don't have to be exhaustive
> and ps(1) is already demonst
