ok benno@
Reyk Floeter(r...@openbsd.org) on 2019.05.08 20:35:46 +0200:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:07:43PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:26:45PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > > > Rivo
Hi!
Seems to work fine.
Rivo
On 2019-05-08 21:37, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:07:43PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:26:45PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Rivo
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:07:43PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:26:45PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > > Rivo Nurges(rivo.nur...@smit.ee) on 2019.03.05 22:42:13 +:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > On
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:26:45PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > Rivo Nurges(rivo.nur...@smit.ee) on 2019.03.05 22:42:13 +:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On 3/5/19 10:36 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > > I guess that this would need
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Rivo Nurges(rivo.nur...@smit.ee) on 2019.03.05 22:42:13 +:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 3/5/19 10:36 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > I guess that this would need strcasestr() instead of strcasecmp(), since
> > > you
> > > are looking
Hi!
Anyone?
Rivo
On 2019-03-12 21:50, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Bump...
>
> Rivo
>
> On 3/6/19 10:57 PM, Rivo Nurges wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> On 3/6/19 10:20 PM, Rivo Nurges wrote:
>>> On 3/6/19 6:36 PM, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Does something like this make sense?
i think
Hi!
Bump...
Rivo
On 3/6/19 10:57 PM, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> On 3/6/19 10:20 PM, Rivo Nurges wrote:
>> On 3/6/19 6:36 PM, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Does something like this make sense?
>>>
>>> i think the seperator list needs to include '\t'
>>> because
Hi!
On 3/6/19 10:20 PM, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> On 3/6/19 6:36 PM, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>>> Does something like this make sense?
>>
>> i think the seperator list needs to include '\t'
>> because https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#appendix-B includes HTAB.
>>
>> And i dont think you can mix ","
On 3/6/19 6:36 PM, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>> Does something like this make sense?
>
> i think the seperator list needs to include '\t'
> because https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#appendix-B includes HTAB.
>
> And i dont think you can mix "," with " \t" seperators,
> because otherwise "Foo
Rivo Nurges(rivo.nur...@smit.ee) on 2019.03.05 22:42:13 +:
> Hi!
>
> On 3/5/19 10:36 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > I guess that this would need strcasestr() instead of strcasecmp(), since you
> > are looking for the substring "Upgrade" in value. Maybe more is needed if
> > we want to be sure
Hi!
On 3/5/19 10:36 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I guess that this would need strcasestr() instead of strcasecmp(), since you
> are looking for the substring "Upgrade" in value. Maybe more is needed if
> we want to be sure that 'Connection: Upgrade-maybe' does not match.
You are correct about
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:21:30PM +, Rivo Nurges wrote:
> Hi!
>
> RFC 6455 4.2.1 states:
> 4. A |Connection| header field that *includes* the token "Upgrade",
> treated as an ASCII case-insensitive value.
>
> In my test case Firefox sends: Connection: keep-alive, Upgrade
>
> Relayd
12 matches
Mail list logo