On 2013/05/23 15:03, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Stuart Henderson(st...@openbsd.org) on 2013.05.22 21:18:05 +0100:
On 2013/05/22 20:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
does anyone see a downside to this?
i see none other than making the maze of options of route(8) a bit more
bizarre.
if the
On 2013/05/22 20:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
does anyone see a downside to this? if the address family is not
explicitly specified, assume v6 if it looks like it may be an ipv6
address.
allows e.g. route get 2001:200:dff:fff1:216:3eff:feb1:44d7
without needing to specify -inet6.
oops, as
