On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:54:23AM +1000, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 23/01/17(Mon) 01:18, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > [...]
> > Last bit for now. This is changing the reporting madness. It moves it in
> > its own function which is called after the big switch statement.
> > If you hit a bad error in
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:56:02PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:18:05AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Last bit for now. This is changing the reporting madness. It moves it in
> > its own function which is called after the big switch statement.
> > If you hit a bad
On 23/01/17(Mon) 01:18, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> [...]
> Last bit for now. This is changing the reporting madness. It moves it in
> its own function which is called after the big switch statement.
> If you hit a bad error in the switch the code should eiter goto fail or
> flush.
> The new function
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:18:05AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Last bit for now. This is changing the reporting madness. It moves it in
> its own function which is called after the big switch statement.
> If you hit a bad error in the switch the code should eiter goto fail or
> flush.
> The new
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 01:28:02AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:51:52AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > I sent this diff out some time ago and would really like to get this in.
> > This is one step on makeing rtsock.c less of a hornets nest.
> > This reduces the side
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:31:20AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 01:28:02AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:51:52AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > I sent this diff out some time ago and would really like to get this in.
> > > This is one step
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 01:28:02AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:51:52AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > I sent this diff out some time ago and would really like to get this in.
> > This is one step on makeing rtsock.c less of a hornets nest.
> > This reduces the side
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:51:52AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I sent this diff out some time ago and would really like to get this in.
> This is one step on makeing rtsock.c less of a hornets nest.
> This reduces the side effects in route_output and simplifies some other
> bits as well. For
