On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:09:53 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:57:58 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> >
> > > Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 19:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
> > > From: Mark Kettenis
> > >
> > > The diff below adds support for higher speeds as supported by
> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:57:58 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> > Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 19:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> >
> > The diff below adds support for higher speeds as supported by UHS-I SD
> > cards to the generic sdmmc(4) layer. The diff in itself does not
>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:57:58PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 19:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> >
> > The diff below adds support for higher speeds as supported by UHS-I SD
> > cards to the generic sdmmc(4) layer. The diff in itself does not
> > enabl
Mark Kettenis writes:
>> However, to make sure this diff doesn't break existing lower speed
>> modes I'd appreciate tests on a variety of hardware. So if sdmmc(4)
>> shows up in your dmesg, please test this by exercising your (u)SD or
>> (e)MMC cards.
No problems encountered reading/writing th
> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 19:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> The diff below adds support for higher speeds as supported by UHS-I SD
> cards to the generic sdmmc(4) layer. The diff in itself does not
> enable the use of those modes. That needs separate changes to the
> SD/MMC control
