Re: syslogd block signals

2016-12-30 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Alexander Bluhm writes: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 04:54:54PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> I think programs should only block the absolutely critical things, and this >> is overreach. > > Yes, blocking SIGINT and SIGQUIT is not clever. I thought there > were races with

Re: syslogd block signals

2016-12-30 Thread Theo de Raadt
Yes, that's much better. It solves the problem, without trying to solve other problems which don't exist. > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 04:54:54PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I think programs should only block the absolutely critical things, and this > > is overreach. > > Yes, blocking SIGINT

Re: syslogd block signals

2016-12-30 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 04:54:54PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > I think programs should only block the absolutely critical things, and this > is overreach. Yes, blocking SIGINT and SIGQUIT is not clever. I thought there were races with SIGCHLD and SIGTERM where only one process would survive.