Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-24 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:42:19PM GMT, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:41:25PM +, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > According to wsmouse(4), the orders is as follows: > > > > This list of three parameters configures these mappings, > > in the order: > > > >

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-24 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:41:25PM +, Raf Czlonka wrote: > According to wsmouse(4), the orders is as follows: > > This list of three parameters configures these mappings, > in the order: > >one-finger,two-finger,three-finger > > Setting a parameter to a

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-23 Thread Ulf Brosziewski
On 3/23/21 8:31 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:52:10PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: >> Thanks for the report. The logging shows that the contacts are recognized, >> so we have indeed to look at the filters of the driver. Two filters are >> relevant here: The first and

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-23 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:52:10PM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > Thanks for the report. The logging shows that the contacts are recognized, > so we have indeed to look at the filters of the driver. Two filters are > relevant here: The first and essential one checks whether the duration of > a

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-23 Thread Ulf Brosziewski
Thanks for the report. The logging shows that the contacts are recognized, so we have indeed to look at the filters of the driver. Two filters are relevant here: The first and essential one checks whether the duration of a contact exceeds the "tapping timeout" (180ms by default). The second

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-23 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:26:19AM GMT, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:00:43AM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > > On 3/22/21 10:19 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > >> I was too stupid to look at `wsconsctl' output

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-23 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:00:43AM +0100, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > On 3/22/21 10:19 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > >> I was too stupid to look at `wsconsctl' output (which needs root) and > >> only looked here. > >> > >> Mailing the

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-22 Thread Ulf Brosziewski
On 3/22/21 10:19 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: >> I was too stupid to look at `wsconsctl' output (which needs root) and >> only looked here. >> >> Mailing the diff for my lack of better wording, plus the knob atually >> takes three values

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-22 Thread Bryan Steele
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > I was too stupid to look at `wsconsctl' output (which needs root) and > only looked here. > > Mailing the diff for my lack of better wording, plus the knob atually > takes three values which I have yet to decode by reading

Re: wsconsctl.conf: mention mouse.tp.tapping in example

2021-03-22 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > I was too stupid to look at `wsconsctl' output (which needs root) and > only looked here. > > Mailing the diff for my lack of better wording, plus the knob atually > takes three values which I have yet to decode by reading