On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:38:17PM -0800, Ori Bernstein wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 13:31:10 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > I did this in an eager way a while back, was told in no uncertain terms
> > "not yet, we're still looking at things".
> >
> > Well, see pledge(2). Whenever the dust settle
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 13:31:10 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> I did this in an eager way a while back, was told in no uncertain terms
> "not yet, we're still looking at things".
>
> Well, see pledge(2). Whenever the dust settles, sure we can kill this line,
> or activate it instead.
>
> Dust is not y
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 11:08:54AM +, George Brown wrote:
> Removes commented out pledge with whitelist, this is the only instance I
> found of this grep'ing through base.
>
> diff --git usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
> index 5caa733f4..cc1cba164 100644
> --- usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
Removes commented out pledge with whitelist, this is the only instance I
found of this grep'ing through base.
diff --git usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
index 5caa733f4..cc1cba164 100644
--- usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
+++ usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
@@ -879,7 +879,6 @@ parse_args(int argc, char *