On 17/08/15(Mon) 19:24, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:03:55PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 17/08/15(Mon) 18:25, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:34:13PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Ultimately my goal is to use rt_ifa_{add,del}() instead of
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:34:13PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Ultimately my goal is to use rt_ifa_{add,del}() instead of
nd6_prefix_{on,off}link() but right now I need to remove the
rt-ref_cnt--.
This diff does that and reduce the differences between these functions.
Note that
Ultimately my goal is to use rt_ifa_{add,del}() instead of
nd6_prefix_{on,off}link() but right now I need to remove the
rt-ref_cnt--.
This diff does that and reduce the differences between these functions.
Note that nd6_prefix_onlink()'s error are always logged so I doubt we
need two messages.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:34:13PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Ultimately my goal is to use rt_ifa_{add,del}() instead of
nd6_prefix_{on,off}link() but right now I need to remove the
rt-ref_cnt--.
@@ -1861,26 +1856,11 @@ nd6_prefix_onlink(struct nd_prefix *pr)
On 17/08/15(Mon) 18:25, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:34:13PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Ultimately my goal is to use rt_ifa_{add,del}() instead of
nd6_prefix_{on,off}link() but right now I need to remove the
rt-ref_cnt--.
@@ -1861,26 +1856,11 @@
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:03:55PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 17/08/15(Mon) 18:25, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:34:13PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Ultimately my goal is to use rt_ifa_{add,del}() instead of
nd6_prefix_{on,off}link() but right now I need to
