Florian Obser wrotes:
>On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 04:29:21PM +0330, temp+...@frad.ir wrote:
>> Hi tech@,
>>
>> I recently checked the slowcgi(8) and found that it might have an issue
>> when buf_pos is at the end of buffer and buf_len is zero.
>>
>> Am I right?
>
>we can simplify this even more.
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 04:29:21PM +0330, temp+...@frad.ir wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> I recently checked the slowcgi(8) and found that it might have an issue
> when buf_pos is at the end of buffer and buf_len is zero.
>
> Am I right?
we can simplify this even more. There is no need to remember the
>I recently checked the slowcgi(8) and found that it might have an issue
>when buf_pos is at the end of buffer and buf_len is zero.
>
>Am I right?
It seems that all fastcgi blocks are aligned in 8-bytes and buffer size
is 8+65535+255 = 65798 bytes which is not aligned in 8-bytes. It seems
that
Hi tech@,
I recently checked the slowcgi(8) and found that it might have an issue
when buf_pos is at the end of buffer and buf_len is zero.
Am I right?
Index: slowcgi.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/slowcgi/slowcgi.c,v
retrieving
