OK, sure
> On 14.10.2016, at 14:26, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
>
> The switch(4) packet_out handler wasn't handling some cases, so here is
> the missing code.
>
> 1) pout_buffer_id is a 4 bytes field and it was using the wrong define
> to check for absence of buffers;
> 2) When a buffer_id was se
The switch(4) packet_out handler wasn't handling some cases, so here is
the missing code.
1) pout_buffer_id is a 4 bytes field and it was using the wrong define
to check for absence of buffers;
2) When a buffer_id was sent the code didn't handle this, now when this
happens we send an error m