Ok, got it, not to pay too much attention to the libraries other than
tesseract itself
среда, 15 апреля 2020 г., 21:45:39 UTC+3 пользователь zdenop написал:
>
> Just for future reference: for AVX (and ...) support there is needed to
> rebuild only tesseract - it depends on compiler and HW.
> Of
Just for future reference: for AVX (and ...) support there is needed to
rebuild only tesseract - it depends on compiler and HW.
Of course it make sense to use the latest version of tesseract
dependencies (because of security, bugfixes etc) , but they have (AFAIK)
minimum effect on tesseract speed
Yes exactly, I updated libraries (without turbojpeg and libarchive) and
added AVX2 support, now t works at least 10 times faster than before.
Problem solved. Thank you very much!
Ravil
вторник, 14 апреля 2020 г., 13:25:03 UTC+3 пользователь zdenop написал:
>
> Without AVX support tesseract 4/5
Without AVX support tesseract 4/5 will be slow(er). So try to focus on this.
Using more than one lang will slower OCR too...
Zdenko
ut 14. 4. 2020 o 5:56 Ravil R napísal(a):
> Oh you gave so much info, thanks!
> My test exe file shows this version information:
> tesseract 5.0.0
>
Oh you gave so much info, thanks!
My test exe file shows this version information:
tesseract 5.0.0
leptonica-1.79.0 (Apr 14 2020, 06:42:43) [MSC v.1900 LIB Debug x86]
libjpeg 9b : libpng 1.6.32 : libtiff 4.0.7 : zlib 1.2.11
Looks like I need to add (upgrade) the whole package
понедельник, 13
OS Name: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
OS Version:10.0.18362 N/A Build 18362
System Model: Latitude E5570
System Type: x64-based PC
Processor(s): 1 Processor(s) Installed.
[01]: Intel64 Family 6 Model
1) It has a standard fax 204x196 dpi of course I can convert it to 300x300
and then recognize. Does it make sense?
2) Font could be of any type and of different language (eng or rus) so no
fine tuning is possible.
понедельник, 13 апреля 2020 г., 17:56:24 UTC+3 пользователь shree написал:
>
> >
> if a tested app is compiled using Release build it is 30% faster, but
still very slow.
Debug builds are going to be slower.
I tested with command line on linux. The tif file does take long to
recognize. Changing file to 300 dpi and smaller size speeded up the time
somewhat.
If all your images
Sorry, I have just now seen your full answer with the questions, yesterday
i've just got an email with the advice to go to the forum, that I did.
Now the answers
1) I tested the latest 5.0.0-alpha build using all types of data files,
modern: best, fast, normal and old: for 3.0 version
2)
Why you decided to ignore instructions in comment
https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/issues/2946#issuecomment-612613461
?
Why we should care about your problems if you do not care?
Zdenko
ne 12. 4. 2020 o 16:00 Ravil R napísal(a):
> I have my own simple Windows dll based on
I have my own simple Windows dll based on tesseractmain,cpp code. It works
fine since Tesseract 3x (now I moved it the latest 5 build) and the only
issue still persists is its low speed - 1 page TIFF takes around 2 minutes
even with the Fast version of tessdata ('eng+rus'). Is this how it
11 matches
Mail list logo
