Hi, for engtrain and engeval they almost have the same command but for eval you specify the font using the argument --font-list, while in train you define the fonts in language-specifics.sh , I ran both command and I noticed that they produce the same results files, except in engtrain case there will be lstmf file for each font in language-specific.sh.
but now there is another question, in the fine tuning <https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/wiki/TrainingTesseract-4.00#fine-tuning-for-impact>the command is: training/lstmtraining --model_output ~/tesstutorial/impact_from_small/impact \ --continue_from ~/tesstutorial/engoutput/base_checkpoint \ --train_listfile ~/tesstutorial/engeval/eng.training_files.txt \ --max_iterations 1200 and for evaluating its also uses: training/lstmeval --model ~/tesstutorial/impact_from_small/impact_checkpoint \ --eval_listfile ~/tesstutorial/engeval/eng.training_files.txt for me it seems its a typo at the fine tuning command since the argument --eval_listfile *~/tesstutorial/engeval* so in both cases the commands contains engeval, my question, since I don't want to run the fine tuning many times, so can I use the training files that exists in the engtrain ? instead to create files for the engeval for every font and then run the fine tune against its training files. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tesseract-ocr@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/8d8728e5-7629-4e5e-ac0d-8a31233f8094%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
