Re: F21: Dare I ask about /boot on a btrfs subvolume?

2014-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 01:28 +0100, poma wrote: > On 28.10.2014 17:26, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:27 +0100, poma wrote: > > > >> Don't leave us waiting, it takes 15 minutes to test the kernel, man. > >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85160 > > > > What? > >

Re: fedup warnings

2014-10-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Oct 28, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > I guess I'll try it again… I get the same warnings as previously reported. But this time the reboot fedup environment installs everything, I get a 3.17.1 kernel, and all the right version badging on the subsequent post-upgrade reboot. So it

Re: F21: Dare I ask about /boot on a btrfs subvolume?

2014-10-28 Thread poma
On 28.10.2014 17:26, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:27 +0100, poma wrote: > >> Don't leave us waiting, it takes 15 minutes to test the kernel, man. >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85160 > > What? > > You asked a question (in your usual opaque way), I answered i

Re: fedup warnings

2014-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 15:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > OK yeah, this sounds rather dire at the end, but is beyond confusing… x > requires x, y requires y, z requires z. Umm what? > > > WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test: > broken dependencies > NetworkManager-wifi

Re: fedup warnings

2014-10-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Oct 28, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Continue with the upgrade at your own risk. I rebooted, chose System Upgrade (fedup), it started the upgrade, and I walked away. When I came back 30 minutes later the laptop had powered off which seems odd. On cold boot: a.) No Fedora 21 k

Re: [Fedora QA] #454: Proposed Test Day - Server

2014-10-28 Thread Fedora QA
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server ---+--- Reporter: junland | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21 Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0 Resolution:| Keywords: Blocked By:

Re: fedup warnings

2014-10-28 Thread Chris Murphy
OK yeah, this sounds rather dire at the end, but is beyond confusing… x requires x, y requires y, z requires z. Umm what? WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test: broken dependencies NetworkManager-wifi-1:0.9.10.0-5.git20140704.fc21.x86_64 requires NetworkManager-wifi-1

fedup warnings

2014-10-28 Thread Chris Murphy
I'm following this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_fedup_cli_previous_desktop Except that I started with an updated F20 infrastructure server packageset installation, not previous desktop. Here's what I get, let me know if any of these need bugs filed. So far it's downloadin

Re: F21: Dare I ask about /boot on a btrfs subvolume?

2014-10-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Oct 27, 2014, at 9:20 PM, poma wrote: > grubby grubby grubby grubby grubby grubby > and at the end you finishes with the grub2-mkconfig. :) > What gets support, grubby or grub!? grub2-mkconfig has worked correctly on Btrfs for a while with regard to subvolumes. grubby get confused. You have

Re: [Fedora QA] #454: Proposed Test Day - Server

2014-10-28 Thread Fedora QA
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server ---+--- Reporter: junland | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21 Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0 Resolution:| Keywords: Blocked By:

Re: [Fedora QA] #454: Proposed Test Day - Server

2014-10-28 Thread Fedora QA
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server ---+--- Reporter: junland | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21 Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0 Resolution:| Keywords: Blocked By:

Re: [Fedora QA] #454: Proposed Test Day - Server

2014-10-28 Thread Fedora QA
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server ---+--- Reporter: junland | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21 Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0 Resolution:| Keywords: Blocked By:

[Fedora QA] #454: Proposed Test Day - Server

2014-10-28 Thread Fedora QA
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server --+ Reporter: junland | Owner: junland Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21 Component: Test Day | Version: 2.0 Keywords:| Blocked By: Bl

Re: F21: Dare I ask about /boot on a btrfs subvolume?

2014-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:27 +0100, poma wrote: > Don't leave us waiting, it takes 15 minutes to test the kernel, man. > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85160 What? You asked a question (in your usual opaque way), I answered it. I wasn't saying I was going to test /boot on btrfs. --

Re: rawhide report: 20141028 changes

2014-10-28 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 10:57 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > [dragonegg] > dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires libLLVM-3.4.so > dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21 This one's a joy. dragonegg is a gcc plugin that basically replaces the middle and

[Fwd: [Action Required] Fedora 21 Server Beta Validation]

2014-10-28 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Whoops, I forgot to CC the QA list on this. If you wish to volunteer for any part of this, PLEASE make sure that ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org is listed in the TO: or CC: lines, or we will probably miss it. --- Begin Message --- As I assume everyone on this list knows by now, Beta was delayed by a

F-21 Branched report: 20141028 changes

2014-10-28 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 28 07:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

rawhide report: 20141028 changes

2014-10-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Oct 28 05:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [Sp

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2014-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13399/asterisk-11.13.1-1.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13535/file-5.19-7.fc21 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13537

Re: F21: Dare I ask about /boot on a btrfs subvolume?

2014-10-28 Thread poma
On 28.10.2014 05:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 04:20 +0100, poma wrote: >> On 27.10.2014 14:19, Gene Czarcinski wrote: >> >>> Yes, Peter (pjones is the grubby maintainer) has informed me that Fedora >>> 22 (currently in rawhide) will be the target for btrfs support in the >>>

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2014-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 179 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20 73 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20 48 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/

Fedora 19 updates-testing report

2014-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 367 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 179 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19 130 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20