On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 01:28 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 28.10.2014 17:26, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:27 +0100, poma wrote:
> >
> >> Don't leave us waiting, it takes 15 minutes to test the kernel, man.
> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85160
> >
> > What?
> >
On Oct 28, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I guess I'll try it again…
I get the same warnings as previously reported. But this time the reboot fedup
environment installs everything, I get a 3.17.1 kernel, and all the right
version badging on the subsequent post-upgrade reboot. So it
On 28.10.2014 17:26, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:27 +0100, poma wrote:
>
>> Don't leave us waiting, it takes 15 minutes to test the kernel, man.
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85160
>
> What?
>
> You asked a question (in your usual opaque way), I answered i
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 15:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> OK yeah, this sounds rather dire at the end, but is beyond confusing… x
> requires x, y requires y, z requires z. Umm what?
>
>
> WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
> broken dependencies
> NetworkManager-wifi
On Oct 28, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Continue with the upgrade at your own risk.
I rebooted, chose System Upgrade (fedup), it started the upgrade, and I walked
away. When I came back 30 minutes later the laptop had powered off which seems
odd. On cold boot:
a.) No Fedora 21 k
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server
---+---
Reporter: junland | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21
Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
OK yeah, this sounds rather dire at the end, but is beyond confusing… x
requires x, y requires y, z requires z. Umm what?
WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
broken dependencies
NetworkManager-wifi-1:0.9.10.0-5.git20140704.fc21.x86_64 requires
NetworkManager-wifi-1
I'm following this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_fedup_cli_previous_desktop
Except that I started with an updated F20 infrastructure server packageset
installation, not previous desktop.
Here's what I get, let me know if any of these need bugs filed. So far it's
downloadin
On Oct 27, 2014, at 9:20 PM, poma wrote:
> grubby grubby grubby grubby grubby grubby
> and at the end you finishes with the grub2-mkconfig. :)
> What gets support, grubby or grub!?
grub2-mkconfig has worked correctly on Btrfs for a while with regard to
subvolumes. grubby get confused. You have
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server
---+---
Reporter: junland | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21
Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server
---+---
Reporter: junland | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21
Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server
---+---
Reporter: junland | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21
Component: Test Day |Version: 2.0
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:
#454: Proposed Test Day - Server
--+
Reporter: junland | Owner: junland
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21
Component: Test Day | Version: 2.0
Keywords:| Blocked By:
Bl
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:27 +0100, poma wrote:
> Don't leave us waiting, it takes 15 minutes to test the kernel, man.
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85160
What?
You asked a question (in your usual opaque way), I answered it. I wasn't
saying I was going to test /boot on btrfs.
--
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 10:57 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> [dragonegg]
> dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires libLLVM-3.4.so
> dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
This one's a joy. dragonegg is a gcc plugin that basically replaces the
middle and
Whoops, I forgot to CC the QA list on this. If you wish to volunteer for
any part of this, PLEASE make sure that ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org
is listed in the TO: or CC: lines, or we will probably miss it.
--- Begin Message ---
As I assume everyone on this list knows by now, Beta was delayed by a
Compose started at Tue Oct 28 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
Compose started at Tue Oct 28 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[Sp
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13399/asterisk-11.13.1-1.fc21
4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13535/file-5.19-7.fc21
4
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-13537
On 28.10.2014 05:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 04:20 +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 27.10.2014 14:19, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, Peter (pjones is the grubby maintainer) has informed me that Fedora
>>> 22 (currently in rawhide) will be the target for btrfs support in the
>>>
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
179 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5897/nrpe-2.15-2.fc20
73
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20
48
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10451/
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
367
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
179 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5896/nrpe-2.15-2.fc19
130
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
22 matches
Mail list logo