You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150217_Summary
The individual test result pages are:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:21 -0800, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test
event for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218.
In case anyone's wondering - I nominated this nightly manually, even
though yesterday's was also nominated, because we
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 18:49 -0700, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
Found my bug on this -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157258
See also
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#environment-product-conflictsÂ
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1160917 , which
Just testing out a F22 install, and I can't switch to VT2 at all. Actually,
only VT1 and VT4 appear to be active.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194015
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 02/18/2015 12:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing
Wine seems to have been broken about the same time
the kernel was bumped to 3.20. I was unable to load
any of the usual apps with yesterday's snapshot.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
In my personal, arguably pedantic opinion, this isn't something that should
be encouraged.
That's reasonable. What's the rationale for group Fedora Server
being visible instead of one of the many hidden groups?
--
#461: Proposed Test Day - i18n
---+---
Reporter: tagoh | Owner: pschindl
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked
#461: Proposed Test Day - i18n
---+---
Reporter: tagoh | Owner: pschindl
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked
On Feb 18, 2015 3:33 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
In my personal, arguably pedantic opinion, this isn't something that
should
be encouraged.
That's reasonable. What's the rationale for group Fedora
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'd agree with Pete that this isn't *really* something we intend to
'support'; you're supposed to pick a product by, well, installing that
product (and, as a one-time thing, on fedup from 21). You're not
On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2015 3:33 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
In my personal, arguably pedantic opinion, this isn't something that
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
138
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
91
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
67
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21
59
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
Good question, let's kick it up to someone who can answer authoritatively.
Stephen, is this group intended for user consumption? If yes, how; if
On February 18, 2015 12:15:27 AM PST, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
You can see all results, find testing instructions and image
download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150217_Summary
The
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:46:31 -0800,
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote:
Wine seems to have been broken about the same time
the kernel was bumped to 3.20. I was unable to load
any of the usual apps with yesterday's snapshot.
It may be just the latest wine update. I filed the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Dan Mossor danofs...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, if you don't supply --product, it returns a Usage error, IOW the
--product specifier is required.
OK good. So no user is unwittingly ending up with some outcome they
haven't signed up for.
--
Chris Murphy
--
test
On 02/18/2015 04:45 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'd agree with Pete that this isn't *really* something we intend to
'support'; you're supposed to pick a product by, well, installing that
product (and, as a one-time
22 matches
Mail list logo
