On 31.05.2015 20:08, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
And already we have fought for this user's side simplification, but it seems
developers are very persistent when they do not need to be.
In the past changes with this effect were reverted. This time they were not.
This generally just affects
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:07:34 +0200, poma wrote:
# yum erase dnf
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package dnf.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased
--- Package dnf-yum.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased
-- Processing Dependency: dnf-yum for package:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic
release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic
live image that
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:38:31 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because remixes
wouldn't be able to ship the source, then.
However, there's something to be said for including them together in
the same upstream project and
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:38:31 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because
remixes
wouldn't be able to ship the source, then.
However, there's something to be
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
171
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20
126
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20
109
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
131
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21
76
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21
61
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
63
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5948/asterisk-13.3.2-1.fc22
41
Compose started at Thu Jun 11 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[ambari]
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
On 06/10/2015 10:51 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 05/22/2015 10:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500
kevin martin ktm...@gmail.com wrote:
...snip...
Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from
systemd to
On 09.06.2015 16:47, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 09.06.2015 15:45, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote:
On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote:
On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote:
On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote:
On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote:
On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote:
Failed to
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:51:11 -0500
Kevin Martin ktm...@gmail.com wrote:
Tried getting the koji build but there were too many dependency
issues to install it and I'm still not getting a Rawhide version that
can be installed. Still getting:
Error: Transaction check error:
file
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from
systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the
systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package
(as discussed about a year ago).
15 matches
Mail list logo