On Wednesday, August 26, 2015, info wrote:
Hello Mr. Info. Can you use your real name in email address?
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Hello fedora QA community I'm very glad to collaborate with this project.
the true is that i'm have to much knowledge about QA but i will learn this
in the time.
and well my two first bug report are here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256225
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
21 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13287
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13824
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upda
Please disregard, the individual found the missing package he needed to
installits working now.
From: devo8...@outlook.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: FW: SELINUX update Issue F22
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:34:59 -0600
So an individual was following
https://bugzilla.redhat.
So an individual was following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253926 and wanted to download the
latest patch from koji to upgrade his selinux policy manually. It looks like he
downloaded rpm: selinux-policy-3.13.1-128.12.fc22.noarch.rpm and he said that
on reboot, his system froze
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not the previous:
Cloud base Vagrant x86_64
Generic Boot i386
Generic Boot x86_64
Cloud atomic Vagrant x86_64
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
No images in the previous compose but not this.
Failed openQA tests:
ID: 665 Test: x86_64 universal serv
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not the previous:
Kde Live i386
Workstation Disk armhfp
Design_suite Live i386
Design_suite Live x86_64
Kde Live x86_64
Cinnamon Live i386
Robotics Live x86_64
Soas Live x86_64
Lxde Live i386
Mate Disk armhfp
Soas Live i386
Lxde Live x86_64
S
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 06:12 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> My understanding is that Samba 4.3 is scheduled to ship Sept 8 and
> it
> has support for MIT Kerberos, meaning finally Fedora can do an AD.
> (or
> so say the people on the Samba list).
>
> Given this important added functionality,
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 08:50 -0400, Zach Villers wrote:
> firewalld is complaining some about certain objects being
> deprecated.
> Here is the output of "firewalld --add-port=33533/tcp";
>
> http://ur1.ca/njt49
>
> Lots of firewalld bugs reported, I think this is a new one for F23?
> Should I r
firewalld is complaining some about certain objects being deprecated.
Here is the output of "firewalld --add-port=33533/tcp";
http://ur1.ca/njt49
Lots of firewalld bugs reported, I think this is a new one for F23?
Should I report or is there anything else I should look into first?
Thanks,
Compose started at Tue Aug 25 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[QuantLib]
QuantLib-test-1.6.1-1.fc23.armv7hl requires
libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.58.0
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
Compose started at Tue Aug 25 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[ScientificPython]
ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.i686 requires libmpi.so.1
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:ud
My understanding is that Samba 4.3 is scheduled to ship Sept 8 and it
has support for MIT Kerberos, meaning finally Fedora can do an AD. (or
so say the people on the Samba list).
Given this important added functionality, will Samba 4.3 be rolled into
Fedora 23?
--
test mailing list
test@li
13 matches
Mail list logo