Fedora 24 updates-testing report

2017-05-02 Thread updates
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 133 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08 squid-3.5.23-1.fc24 126 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08 exim-4.87.1-1.fc24 89

fc27 - printing (respectively CUPS)

2017-05-02 Thread GERHARD GOETZHABER
Hi once again! Out of my last trials with fc27 (after many desperate days of no-go today having been successful on getting a working system installed by stepping from Workstation-Live over live installation to setting up xfce afterwords) I think there's still a long list of things to do. So

Fedora 26-20170502.n.0 compose check report

2017-05-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 24/116 (x86_64), 12/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 90236 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL:

Fedora Rawhide-20170502.n.0 compose check report

2017-05-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 70/116 (x86_64), 21/23 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170425.n.0): ID: 90134 Test:

Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-02 Thread Peter Gueckel
I just discovered something odd that explains why umask isn't getting set for the user (me). Traditionally (I researched countless sites about the proper place for things and, as I said, it has always worked in the past, right up until F26), umask is supposed to be in bash_profile. However,

Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-02 Thread Peter Gueckel
Adam Williamson wrote: > So I wouldn't assume that any of the discussion is at > all relevant until you've at least established that someone made a > conscious decision to make some part of KDE not respect those files any > more. It's just as likely, or more likely, to be a straightforward >

Fedora 26 updates-testing report

2017-05-02 Thread updates
The following Fedora 26 Security updates need testing: Age URL 24 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1bf5a0ce01 python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-2.fc26 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5cef2adff4 wireshark-2.2.6-1.fc26 6

Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 23:34 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote: > Peter Gueckel wrote: > > > Gordon Messmer wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F25_bugs#GNOME_Wayland_session_does_not_start_a_login_shell.2C_so_does_not_process_.bash_profile_or_.bashrc_etc. > > I had a look... quite an