OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180913.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180914.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 121
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages
# F29 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-09-17
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers, 6 proposed Beta freeze
exceptions and 8 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
review meeting on Monday (those numbers
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We're still
focused on F29 Beta at the moment, though please do take a minute to
look at the firmware RAID criterion proposal. There will be a blocker
review meeting at 16:00 UTC, please come to that if you can.
If you're aware of
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 279984 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279984
ID: 279991 Test:
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 15:34 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:28 ago on Fri 14 Sep 2018 02:56:09
> PM EDT.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
> Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.fc29.armv7hl
>-
dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:28 ago on Fri 14 Sep 2018 02:56:09
PM EDT.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.fc29.armv7hl
- package bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled
Problem
On 9/14/18 3:09 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes:
RM> Where would I put a 36K output file?
Honestly I figured you would look at the output yourself to see if
anything stands out. Though you redirected stdout and not stderr,
and so the output you pasted showed
> "RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes:
RM> Where would I put a 36K output file?
Honestly I figured you would look at the output yourself to see if
anything stands out. Though you redirected stdout and not stderr,
and so the output you pasted showed the only error output by that
command anyway,
On 9/14/18 2:43 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes:
RM> New f29-beta for armfhp. Just ran dnf update and caught this go
RM> across the screen...
RM> /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
RM> warning:
> "RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes:
RM> New f29-beta for armfhp. Just ran dnf update and caught this go
RM> across the screen...
RM> /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
RM> warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl) scriptlet failed,
RM> exit status 1
OLD: Fedora-29-20180911.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180912.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 103
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 90.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages:134.08 KiB
New f29-beta for armfhp. Just ran dnf update and caught this go across
the screen...
Running scriptlet: anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl
173/190
/sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl) scriptlet
Due to in-progress RC2 for the F29 Beta release and presence of
blocker bugs, the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one
week to “Target #1” date (September 25th)[1]. We are not going to slip
the Final GA yet.
For more information please check the minutes from the F29 Beta
Go/No-Go
On 9/14/18 1:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I
installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network
installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28,
the system takes a long time to display
At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status
of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID
device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be
a blocker for Beta, many of the people present at the meeting
disagreed, for a variety of
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic*
> operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on
> what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found?
FWIW, I never hit such problem.
The
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 23:57 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal
> > wrote:
> > > What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least
> > >
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
> What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least
> selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29.
Well - almost ;-)
$ dnf list installed | grep -i selinux
container-selinux.noarch
2:2.71-2.git5721d74.fc29@fedora
>
> Disabling selinux fixed it. I assume this is already in bugzilla.
> Thanks everyone!
>
Hello,
what do you mean by disabling SElinux? I do not recommend to disable it
completely. Instead, set it to "permissive" mode. With this settings,
SElinux will not be any obstacle to you, but it will
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal
> wrote:
>> What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least
>> selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29.
>
> Well - almost ;-)
>
> $ dnf list installed | grep -i
What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at
least selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29.
Dne pá 14. 9. 2018 8:03 uživatel Aleksandar Kurtakov
napsal:
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
> wrote:
>
>> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
wrote:
> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I
> installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network
> installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28,
> the system takes a
22 matches
Mail list logo
