[Test-Announce] 2020-09-21 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 33 Blocker Review Meeting

2020-09-18 Thread Adam Williamson
# F33 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-09-21 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta blockers, 4 proposed Beta freeze exceptions and 3 proposed Final blockers to review, so we'll have a Fedora 33 blocker review meeting on

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2020-09-21 Fedora QA Meeting

2020-09-18 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. I don't have much for the agenda, and I actually won't be available to run the meeting either. If there is a desire to have the meeting, someone else can volunteer to run it :) Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC:

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

2020-09-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 16:10 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > 4. abrt  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878317 — NEW > Can't report a crash (even with local processing) due to "Could not > resolve host: retrace.fedoraproject.org" > > Since the retrace server is still offline, abrt should

FedoraRespin-32-updates-20200918.0 compose check report

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/37 (x86_64) ID: 670965 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/670965 ID: 670992 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL:

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

2020-09-18 Thread Ben Cotton
We're getting close! I'm going to make Adam request an RC next week whether he likes it or not. :-) Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. libreport — abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core dumps produced by systemd-246~rc1-1.fc33 — VERIFIED

Re: Python 3.9.0rc2 Fedora 33 update

2020-09-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 18. 09. 20 11:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. Python 3.9.0rc2, the last preview before the final release of Python 3.9.0 has been released yesterday. The Fedora 33 update is at: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-78bb031321 Should I try to get a freeze exception and get

Fedora-IoT-33-20200918.0 compose check report

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200917.2): ID: 670772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/670772 ID: 670775 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso

Re: holding shift on boot does not reveal grub menu

2020-09-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:10 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:10 PM Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> Using virt-manager, F8 increases the sound on my laptop. > > > Then it's not F8 :D Either configure your keyboard (in BIOS, in runtime) to > use Fx keys instead of multimedia keys,

Re: holding shift on boot does not reveal grub menu

2020-09-18 Thread Kamil Paral
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:10 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > Using virt-manager, F8 increases the sound on my laptop. Then it's not F8 :D Either configure your keyboard (in BIOS, in runtime) to use Fx keys instead of multimedia keys, or pressing Fn+F8 should actually send F8, at least that's how most

Testing F33 Workstation

2020-09-18 Thread pmkel...@frontier.com
I've been testing right along, but haven't been reporting since the problems I have encountered have been small compared to some of the issues currently on the table. I am currently running F33 Workstation-Live 0916.n.0. As usual my testing is on bare metal. The installs have been running

Fedora-33-20200918.n.0 compose check report

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200917.n.0): ID: 670514 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/670514 ID: 670540 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

Re: holding shift on boot does not reveal grub menu

2020-09-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:14 PM Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> holding shift key down does not reveal GRUB menu (edit) >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880169 >> >> >> I'm not sure when this regression appeared. It was working

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200918.n.0 changes

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20200917.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200918.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:47 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 126 Size of added packages: 10.30 MiB Size of dropped packages:1.04 GiB

Re: Self-introduction: (Serge Matveenko)

2020-09-18 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:42 PM Serge Matveenko wrote: > Hello, All! > > I would like to join the QA team. My main interests are in validating > releases and testing around Fedora Silverblue along with anything > related to containerization. I'm really interested in testing upcoming > Parental

Self-introduction: (Serge Matveenko)

2020-09-18 Thread Serge Matveenko
Hello, All! I would like to join the QA team. My main interests are in validating releases and testing around Fedora Silverblue along with anything related to containerization. I'm really interested in testing upcoming Parental Control features as well. About me:) I'm 39. I'm located in

Fedora-IoT-34-20200918.0 compose check report

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200917.0): ID: 670448 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL:

Fedora-Rawhide-20200918.n.0 compose check report

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 20/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200917.n.0): ID:

Re: holding shift on boot does not reveal grub menu

2020-09-18 Thread Stephen Snow
In order to bring up the boot menu in Grub2 you press any key. This is a choice made after BIOS boot selection (if on EFI/UEFI BIOS). I am running Silverblue on F33 Rawhide compose 33.20200914.n.0 (2020-09-14T08:05:11Z) (915,916, and 917 won't boot) and it works on my bare metal setup.

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200918.0 compose check report

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200918.n.0 changes

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200917.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200918.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 80 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 20.24 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Python 3.9.0rc2 Fedora 33 update

2020-09-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello. Python 3.9.0rc2, the last preview before the final release of Python 3.9.0 has been released yesterday. The Fedora 33 update is at: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-78bb031321 Should I try to get a freeze exception and get it to Fedora 33 Beta? Pros: We would

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200918.0 compose check report

2020-09-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200917.0): ID: 670151 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: holding shift on boot does not reveal grub menu

2020-09-18 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:14 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > holding shift key down does not reveal GRUB menu (edit) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880169 > > > I'm not sure when this regression appeared. It was working with F32 > VM's and I think also with some earlier F33 VMs. > >