Hello team,
Here is a new release of f33-backgrounds addressing a bug of broken
symlink due to typo:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-27f80050a2
Thanks in advance for testing and adding karma!
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
Hi friends.
I was testing this iso on a VM today
(Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-33-20201005.n.0.iso) and after the
installation it starts with a generic cinnamon wallpaper, and not the
standard F33 one (although its simple to chose it from the cinnamon
desktop).
For me it's not really a
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 4/170 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201005.n.0):
ID: 686308 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/686308
ID: 686405 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
OLD: Fedora-33-20201005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201006.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 62
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 186
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 20.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages:15.70 MiB
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in
The following Fedora 31 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
18 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c5ec22e14f
libuv-1.39.0-1.fc31 nodejs-12.18.4-1.fc31
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d46fe34349
xen-4.12.3-5.fc31
6
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 685979 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/685979
Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201004.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201006.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 58
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 192
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.14 GiB
Size of dropped packages
On 10/6/20 10:17 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
One way or another, I need to roll back until SOGo has time to finish
porting their extension to the new API.
Well, I rolled back, but now the Lightning extension isn't enabled or
even visible in Add-ons, so I have to figure out how to fix that.
Very unpleasant. I just did a normal update on F32, and tbird 78.3.1 was
installed. Now my calendar is gone. Why would a breaking version of tbird be
pushed to a stable release?
Steve
On 10/6/20 7:29 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 19:05:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
In
On 10/6/20 4:29 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Thunderbird 78 seems to be a major "breaking" upgrade:
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/78.2.1/releasenotes/#changes
I definitely think this should be rolled back. We're past the beta
freeze, and IMO, this violates the updates policy which
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 19:05:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> In testing the upcoming F33 release I noticed that it has included
> thunderbird-78.3.1-1.
>
> I decided that I wanted to test the newest TBird but didn't want to go
> through the process of setting up
> accounts. So, I downloaded this
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:59 PM David wrote:
> I do not know yet how to check other temperatures while in Fedora.
>
I really like the terminal application 'glances' for seeing what's going on
in my system.
Thanks,
Richard
___
test mailing list --
In testing the upcoming F33 release I noticed that it has included
thunderbird-78.3.1-1.
I decided that I wanted to test the newest TBird but didn't want to go through
the process of setting up
accounts. So, I downloaded this new release from F32 updates-testing. What
could go wrong?
IMHO,
14 matches
Mail list logo
