Rawhide question ?

2020-10-31 Thread David
Has Rawhide ever passed a gating-check ? I have seen about a hundred emails saying the next iso did not pass a gating-check. That is kind of annoying. It seems it would be more appropriate to only post a comment about the gating-check when it finally passes, and then I guess have a virtual-toast

Fedora-Rawhide-20201031.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-31 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 13/117 (aarch64), 12/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201031.n.0 changes

2020-10-31 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201030.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201031.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.59 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: fedora 34 Rawhide testing in Virtualbox

2020-10-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 1:20 PM Stephen Snow wrote: > > Judging from the image at the link provided I would say you need to select > your installation destination. > Actually, it looks like MirrorManager wasn't responding quickly enough for getting it to setup properly. It's supposed to autoconf

Re: [fedora-arm] aarch64 testing enabled in openQA production

2020-10-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:31 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > > A few of you have seen this already, but just wanted to send out a > wider announcement: having been deservedly shamed by pbrobinson, I > spent most of this week working on aarch64 testing in openQA, and am > happy to announ

Re: fedora 34 Rawhide testing in Virtualbox

2020-10-31 Thread Stephen Snow
Judging from the image at the link provided I would say you need to select your installation destination. Stephen On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 16:37, Luna Jernberg wrote: Got stuck on collecting group metadata... with the Netinstall image:

Re: fedora 34 Rawhide testing in Virtualbox

2020-10-31 Thread Luna Jernberg
Got stuck on collecting group metadata... with the Netinstall image: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20201030.n.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20201030.n.0.iso On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 4:34 PM Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hello

fedora 34 Rawhide testing in Virtualbox

2020-10-31 Thread Luna Jernberg
Hello I tested some 34 in Virtualbox on Manjaro and Ubuntu today but got stuck on the same step see imgur link: https://imgur.com/a/L061NbB ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201031.0 compose check report

2020-10-31 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (aarch64), 7/7 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Cloud-31-20201030.0): ID: 711506 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount_cloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/711506 ID: 711507 Te

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201031.0 compose check report

2020-10-31 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64), 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201029.0): ID: 711498 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL:

Fedora-Cloud-33-20201031.0 compose check report

2020-10-31 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64), 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201030.0): ID: 711328 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: