Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:00 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > Your reaction is the tribalism I was talking about, negatively reacting to > anything that has "GNOME" or "K" in the name. > As an exercise, imagine the application is not called the GNOME Sound Recorder, but a Fred's Sound Recorder instead. I

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > GNOME applications pull in most of the GNOME desktop as dependencies. > Properly developed KDE applications will pull in the KF5 libraries and > occasionally some Plasma libraries. That's just how it goes. It is > also unrealistic to expect GNO

Fedora-IoT-33-20210121.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20210113.0): ID: 759803 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/759803 ID: 759814 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

> > > > From Lenovo perspective we'd like the image now (or next week) ready for > > > > the 2021 Carbon. If there was a blocker issue then running it again > > > > would be useful (but so far test results are good and I'll know in the > > > >

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

are any red flags. >> >> I will start building an image asap, expect something by the end of >> the day today (hopefully). > > So the image is built now: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60156482 > > I ran the openQA tests on it: > http

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On 1/21/21 6:01 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka > wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa mailto:ngomp...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral mailto:kpa...@redhat.com>> wrote:

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

> > the 2021 Carbon. If there was a blocker issue then running it again > > would be useful (but so far test results are good and I'll know in the > > next couple week(ish) if there are any red flags. > > I will start building an image asap, expect something by the end

Fedora-IoT-34-20210121.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210119.0): ID: 759750 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/759750

Fedora-Rawhide-20210120.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 21/180 (x86_64), 14/122 (aarch64

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:06 AM Mark Pearson wrote: > > > On 21/01/2021 10:46, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:30 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, I don't think that should be really tricky for anyone. I'd > >> suggest we just run it as a post-release nightly compos

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210120.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210118.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210120.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:11 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:211 Upgraded packages: 140 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 177.06 MiB Size of dropped packages:

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On 21/01/2021 10:46, Mohan Boddu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:30 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> Yeah, I don't think that should be really tricky for anyone. I'd >> suggest we just run it as a post-release nightly compose rather than a >> candidate and don't give it any kind of label. I d

Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:30 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Yeah, I don't think that should be really tricky for anyone. I'd > suggest we just run it as a post-release nightly compose rather than a > candidate and don't give it any kind of label. I don't think it should > be hard for releng to run

Proposal to modify: Working Sound Beta Release Criterion

Hello friends of Fedora, I have been thinking about a proposal to modify the %subj. I have tried several version and I did not like any, so finally I am proposing this text: *Working sound* *The installed system must be able to play back and record audio.* This is a very short and general versi

Re: Self-Introduction: Ben Klepzig

On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 20:32 +, Ben Klepzig wrote: > Hello everyone, Hello Ben. Sorry for the late reply. I just sponsored you in the QA team. This list will get updates on different testing related activities and updates from time to time. You can start to test updates in [http://bodhi.fed

Re: Introduction Amanda Cavalcante

> You can start to test updates in [http://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/] for > Fedora 32 and Fedora 33. > Update testing is where a tester tests a package and gives out a +1 > Karma for PASS and -1 Karma for FAIL. You can go to > bodhi.fedoraproject.org where you can sort the packages with Fedora > Rel

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:04 AM Lukas Ruzi

Re: Introduction Amanda Cavalcante

On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 01:26 +, Amanda dos Santos Cavalcante wrote: > Hello, Fedora Project people !!! Hello Amanda, and welcome. I just sponsored you in the QA team. Being a beginner in the Linux universe is not an issue, IMHO. By joining this team you have the chance to learn various things,

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:04 AM Lukas Ruzicka > wrote: > > Have you tested whether gnome-sound-recor

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:04 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: Have you tested whether gnome-sound-recorder works well in KDE and optionally also other desktops? If not (o

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:04 AM Lukas Ruzicka > wrote: > >> Have you tested whether gnome-sound-recorder works well in KDE and >>> optionally also other desktops? If not (or if it pulls too many >>> dependencies), it would be good to sug

Re: Introduction Amanda Cavalcante

Hello friends. I know Amanda from the Brazilian telegram group, she's a friendly and helpful person. I can help her in knowing how to contribute in the QA team, but I cannot add her because I'm not a sponsor. So, please, if any sponsor could help adding her to the team I'll be thankful. :) Geraldo

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:04 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Have you tested whether gnome-sound-recorder works well in KDE and >> optionally also other desktops? If not (or if it pulls too many >> dependencies), it would be good to suggest an alternative tool as well. >> > So, now I have found the KD

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

> > Have you tested whether gnome-sound-recorder works well in KDE and > optionally also other desktops? If not (or if it pulls too many > dependencies), it would be good to suggest an alternative tool as well. > No, I haven't tested it and I was thinking about finding an alternative for KDE. Than

Re: Fedora Audio Test Cases for Test Day (a proposal)

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:21 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:02 PM Brandon Nielsen > wrote: > >> Would some kind of device switching test case be feasible? In my >> experience that's where a lot of weird behavior creeps in. For example, >> plugging in a USB interface, using it,