No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210225.0):
ID: 790239 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 26/187 (x86_64), 17/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210222.n.0):
ID: 789727 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/789727
ID: 789735 Test
OLD: Fedora-34-20210222.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210225.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:19
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:37
Upgraded packages: 168
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.50 MiB
Size of dropped packages:584.67
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 7:25 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
> Out of curiosity I ran scrub on the four machines I have handy here. I
> always do clean installs so the btrfs doesn't have a lot of time on it;
> just since F33 was released.
Scrub is pretty performant regardless of file system age.
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210224.0):
ID: 789572 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/789572
ID: 7895
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:25:04AM -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> Scrub gives no indication that it's running other than the PID. Nor
> does it indicate when it's complete; so I had to monitor the PID to
> know when it was done. Then I had to run:
>
> sudo btrfs scrub status -dR /mnt
>
> t
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/126 (aarch64), 22/187 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
On 2/24/21 20:48, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 2:26 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I recall a long and detailed discussion on this list before F33 was
released concerning what disk maintenance would be required with BTRFS.
As I recall, the final word was along the lines the ru
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210223.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210225.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 132
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.81 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Radek Vykydal (rvyky...@redhat.com) said on the devel list that this
seems to be a fallout of
https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/commit/6b80b7b33c312faa69c22e4bdfe758f186d32786
and oriented me to open this ticket and set it with F34 Beta freeze
exception request.
So, how do we set a Beta free
I opened this BZ ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932961
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/e
Ticket opened:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932961
Em ter., 23 de fev. de 2021 às 11:51, Radek Vykydal
escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> this seems to be a fallout of
> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/commit/6b80b7b33c312faa69c22e4bdfe758f186d32786
> .
>
> We should be able to fix i
Hi, only today I came to see your answer, sorry for been late.
Yes I can open a BZ ticket for that
Thanks
Em ter., 23 de fev. de 2021 às 11:51, Radek Vykydal
escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> this seems to be a fallout of
> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/commit/6b80b7b33c312faa69c22e4bdfe758f186d
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210224.0):
ID: 788994 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
14 matches
Mail list logo
